6 Feb
2019
6 Feb
'19
11:54 a.m.
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:12 -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 1/29/19 11:05 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Eduardo, do you think we might ever get in trouble if we did that? For example, because of QEMU dropping transitional devices but leaving non-transitional devices in?
I believe eduardo is offline for the next few weeks, so I'll make this change in the next version to just track a single capability QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_PCI_NON_TRANSITIONAL
We can always add the fine grained capabilities later if needed.
Sounds good, let's just make sure he has a chance to veto the approach *before* it ends up in a stable libvirt release, to avoid compatibility headaches in case we were wrong O:-) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization