On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:51:51AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:48:06PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Current libvirt checks xenstore for a xen guests fixed vnc port on xend > 3.0.3. At least on f8 though, hvm guests don't store the vnc port in xenstore, it is stored in the sexpr.
Patch fixes the logic to look in the sexpr if the xenstore lookup appears to fail. This fixes setting static vnc ports for f8 xen hvm guests.
Sounds fine to me though I winder if it's not better to check on the given SExpr first and then do a Xenstore lookup only if needed. Seems to me a more generally coherent approach, any expected drawback to this ?
Historically XenD only ever put the VNC port in xenstore. Including it in the SEXPR is something new in 3.2.0 IIRC. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|