Re: [libvirt] [RFC 5/5]: Rewrite findLuns function

Stefan de Konink wrote: > + n = scandir(sysfs_path, &namelist, notdotdir, versionsort); > + if (n <= 0) { > + /* we didn't find any reasonable entries; return failure */ > + virStorageReportError(conn, VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, > + _("Failed to find any LUNs for session %s: %s"), > + session, strerror(errno)); > + > + return -1; > + } > > > Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot > be a real entry? This assumption is wrong. Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there is code below that that is. However, the code here is generally looking for block devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device. Given that, I'm not sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?