Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] add support for QEMU 9pfs 'multidevs' option

On a Friday in 2020, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >On Montag, 30. März 2020 20:27:00 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >> v2->v3: >> * Rebased to master (SHA-1 e4bf03b8ff). >> >> * Auto sense QEMU capability for command line option fsdev.multidevs >> >> instead of checking for QEMU version 4.2. [patch 1] >> >> * Auto regenerated capabilities data for all archs (fixes capability >> >> test). [patch 1] >> >> * Added XML test. [patch 2] >> >> * Added argv test. [patch 3] >> >> Message-ID of v2: cover.1584723662.git.qemu_oss(a)crudebyte.com >> >> Christian Schoenebeck (3): >> qemu: capabilities: add QEMU_CAPS_VIRTFS_MULTIDEVS >> conf: add 'multidevs' option >> qemu: add support for 'multidevs' option >> >> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 40 ++++++++++++- >> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 10 ++++ >> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 29 ++++++++++ >> src/conf/domain_conf.h | 13 +++++ >> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 2 + >> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 + >> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 7 +++ >> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 12 ++++ >> .../caps_4.2.0.aarch64.xml | 1 + >> .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_4.2.0.s390x.xml | 1 + >> .../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.xml | 1 + >> .../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.xml | 1 + >> .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.0.0.ppc64.xml | 1 + >> .../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 + >> .../virtio-9p-multidevs.x86_64-latest.args | 45 +++++++++++++++ >> .../qemuxml2argvdata/virtio-9p-multidevs.xml | 53 ++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 2 + >> .../virtio-9p-multidevs.x86_64-latest.xml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 2 + >> 19 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 >> >> tests/qemuxml2argvdata/virtio-9p-multidevs.x86_64-latest.args create mode >> 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/virtio-9p-multidevs.xml create mode 100644 >> tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/virtio-9p-multidevs.x86_64-latest.xml > >Never mind about this version; it would no longer merge against master. :/ > >I'll post a v4 with merge conflicts being resolved. No need to do that, I already have it applied and rebased