Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> There is unfortunately a pretty prevalent
>>> segfault in the latest libvirt. If a qemu
>>> domain is defined without an emulator
>>> specified, libvirtd crashes.
>>>
>>> This is doubly unfortunate since current
>>> virtinst generates an emulator-less config
>>> for all qemu and kvm guests (I'm about to fix
>>> this upstream though).
>> #%(*&#@(%@. Damn. This is worthy of a brown paper bag release for libvirt
>> to fix this shockingly bad bug.
>>
> If we are going to do this I'd really like to get the
> 2 pending max vcpu patches committed, since it's a
> big issue that we largely disallow smp kvm guests
> at this moment.
Do you need more reviews ? I didn't realized we had pending unapplied
patches ... Repost if necessary, thanks !
Daniel
My maxvcpu patch is dependent on Guido's patch which hasn't been
committed yet but has received enough ACKs
Thanks,
Cole