On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 18:23:42 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On a Tuesday in 2020, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
> > While ugly I still think that for
greppability/searchability it's way
> > better to keep the object name using camel case. In the end as you've
> > pointed out it's just for the specific methods named above. Making it
> > look ugly is IMO less worse than missing something when trying to
> > understand how the code works.
>
> IIRC, Ján raised the issue of avoiding mixed camelcase/snakecase
> namings originally, so CC'ing to see if he's ok with changing
> back again ?
I don't care about it enough to send another e-mail after this one :)
However the case convetion is a part of the macro documentation:
https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/unstable/gobject-Type-Information.htm...
Hmm, sorry I didn't really look into that in the first place so thanks
for teaching me. While I don't like yet another convention, I'm okay
with the naming in this patch based on the above.