Hi,
I assume without this, it's easy to try to add data to NULL hash tables
when using the transient domain API you added in this patch series?
ACK patch, just curious...
Christophe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:39:32PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c
b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c
index b6e7f3b..affb496 100644
--- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c
+++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c
@@ -234,9 +234,15 @@ static void gvir_connection_init(GVirConnection *conn)
priv = conn->priv = GVIR_CONNECTION_GET_PRIVATE(conn);
- memset(priv, 0, sizeof(*priv));
-
priv->lock = g_mutex_new();
+ priv->domains = g_hash_table_new_full(g_str_hash,
+ g_str_equal,
+ NULL,
+ g_object_unref);
+ priv->pools = g_hash_table_new_full(g_str_hash,
+ g_str_equal,
+ NULL,
+ g_object_unref);
}
--
1.7.6.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list