On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 15:16:20 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > From: Cristian Klein <cristiklein(a)gmail.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Klein <cristiklein(a)gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > The migration capability is called x-postcopy-ram in QEMU, which
> > means it's still considered experimental. The main reason for it
> > is to make sure the feature is complete from libvirt's point of
> > view. The "x-" prefix will be removed once we have a working
> > implementation.
>
> So if we decide this patchset is OK, will QEMU remove the 'x-'
> prefix from their code for 2.6 ? It would be desirable not to
> merge code in libvirt that uses the 'x-' prefix at all.
Right, that's the plan.
Ok, well you're obviously OK with the series, and I think the QEMU
interactions are fine too. So we might as well tell them now to
go ahead and remove the x- prefix on the basis that its fine for
libvirt.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|