On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 15:16:20 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
From: Cristian Klein <cristiklein@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Klein <cristiklein@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> ---
Notes: The migration capability is called x-postcopy-ram in QEMU, which means it's still considered experimental. The main reason for it is to make sure the feature is complete from libvirt's point of view. The "x-" prefix will be removed once we have a working implementation.
So if we decide this patchset is OK, will QEMU remove the 'x-' prefix from their code for 2.6 ? It would be desirable not to merge code in libvirt that uses the 'x-' prefix at all.
Right, that's the plan.
Ok, well you're obviously OK with the series, and I think the QEMU interactions are fine too. So we might as well tell them now to go ahead and remove the x- prefix on the basis that its fine for libvirt. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|