On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:37:24PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
From 74f57af2010f9cbe2315d625c6502a0b259e6802 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:03:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xm_internal.c: remove dead increment of "data"
* src/xm_internal.c (xenXMDomainConfigParse): Don't increment it. --- src/xm_internal.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xm_internal.c b/src/xm_internal.c index f206c8c..18613d4 100644 --- a/src/xm_internal.c +++ b/src/xm_internal.c @@ -1314,7 +1314,6 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0')) break; - data++;
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) { if (STRPREFIX(key, "vncunused=")) {
trivial, ACK
From d4db2dfaafbf827d1c8b8626a3dbdaa9f371e479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:09:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xm_internal.c: remove four useless comparisons after strchr
* src/xm_internal.c (xenXMDomainConfigParse): After t=strchr... don't test *t; it's known. This was *not* detected by clang, but I spotted it since once instance was in the vicinity of the dead increment of "data". --- src/xm_internal.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xm_internal.c b/src/xm_internal.c index 18613d4..e7f6a55 100644 --- a/src/xm_internal.c +++ b/src/xm_internal.c @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) { */
/* Extract the source file path*/ - if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')) || offset[0] == '\0') + if (!(offset = strchr(head, ','))) goto skipdisk; if ((offset - head) >= (PATH_MAX-1)) goto skipdisk; @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) { head = head + 6;
/* Extract the dest device name */ - if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')) || offset[0] == '\0') + if (!(offset = strchr(head, ','))) goto skipdisk; if (VIR_ALLOC_N(disk->dst, (offset - head) + 1) < 0) goto no_memory; @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) { char *data; char *nextkey = strchr(key, ',');
- if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0')) + if (!(data = strchr(key, '='))) goto skipnic; data++;
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) { nextkey++; }
- if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0')) + if (!(data = strchr(key, '='))) break;
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) {
Hum, I would like to understand the intent of the person who wrote this first, it's like one s trying to handle a case where strchr( ,c) could return the pointer to the end of string if c is not found or something like that. Weird ... Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/