On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:11:40AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi Dave,
Sorry for the delay. See below
On 07/12/10 20:23, Dave Allan wrote:
Hi Harri,
I spun up a Debian testing box with the versions of libvirt, iet& open-iscsi that you're using, and it works fine for me. My pool xml is:
<pool type="iscsi"> <name>iscsitest</name> <source> <host name="localhost"/> <device path="iqn.2001-04.com.example:foobarbaz"/> </source> <target> <path>/dev/disk/by-path</path> </target> </pool>
Gives the 3 configured LUs as volumes:
Name Path ----------------------------------------- 3.0.0.0 /dev/disk/by-path/ip-127.0.0.1:3260-iscsi-iqn.2001-04.com.example:foobarbaz-lun-0 3.0.0.1 /dev/disk/by-path/ip-127.0.0.1:3260-iscsi-iqn.2001-04.com.example:foobarbaz-lun-1 3.0.0.2 /dev/disk/by-path/ip-127.0.0.1:3260-iscsi-iqn.2001-04.com.example:foobarbaz-lun-2
In my environment the new volume is not listed by virsh vol-list, even though /dev/disk/by-path shows the iscsi block devices:
# virsh vol-list --pool iscsi.dpcl064 Name Path -----------------------------------------
# ls -al /dev/disk/by-path/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 320 Jul 15 10:56 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 120 Jul 15 2010 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Jul 15 10:56 ip-172.19.97.183:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-07.de.aixigo.ac.dpcl064:storage-lun-0 -> ../../sdd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jul 15 10:56 ip-172.19.97.183:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-07.de.aixigo.ac.dpcl064:storage-lun-0-part1 -> ../../sdd1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jul 15 10:56 ip-172.19.97.183:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-07.de.aixigo.ac.dpcl064:storage-lun-0-part2 -> ../../sdd2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Jul 15 09:32 pci-0000:00:03.0-usb-0:2:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0 -> ../../sdc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Jul 15 09:33 pci-0000:01:0e.0-scsi-0:0:0:0 -> ../../sda : :
The virt-manager GUI knows about the defined iscsi volume, so I would guess this is just a minor bug in virsh.
I set up a debian testing box with the same versions of the software you have, and I don't see any problems. Virsh displays the voumes correctly, so I don't think this is a bug. Virsh and virt-manager get their information from the same source. If you're seeing a difference in the volume listing, then you're very likely looking at two different pools. Can you post the output of virsh pool-dumpxml iscsi.dpcl064 Dave