In v6.4.0-rc1~143 I've introduced a check that is supposed to
return from the function early, if given path is not a dm target.
While the idea is still valid, the implementation had a flaw.
It calls stat() over given path and the uses major(sb.st_dev) to
learn the major of the device. This is then passed to
dm_is_dm_major() which returns true or false depending whether
the device is under devmapper's control or not.
The problem with this approach is in how the major of the device
is obtained - paths managed by devmapper are special files and
thus we want to be using st_rdev instead of st_dev to obtain the
major number. Well, that's what virIsDevMapperDevice() does
already so might as well us that.
Fixes: 01626c668ecfbe465d18799ac4628e6127ea1d47
Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839992
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/util/virdevmapper.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virdevmapper.c b/src/util/virdevmapper.c
index 600e1f6322..40a82285f9 100644
--- a/src/util/virdevmapper.c
+++ b/src/util/virdevmapper.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ virDevMapperGetTargetsImpl(const char *path,
char ***devPaths_ret,
unsigned int ttl)
{
- struct stat sb;
struct dm_task *dmt = NULL;
struct dm_deps *deps;
struct dm_info info;
@@ -83,13 +82,7 @@ virDevMapperGetTargetsImpl(const char *path,
return ret;
}
- if (stat(path, &sb) < 0) {
- if (errno == ENOENT)
- return 0;
- return -1;
- }
-
- if (!dm_is_dm_major(major(sb.st_dev)))
+ if (!virIsDevMapperDevice(path))
return 0;
if (!(dmt = dm_task_create(DM_DEVICE_DEPS))) {
--
2.26.2