17 Aug
2012
17 Aug
'12
10:08 a.m.
On 2012年08月17日 16:29, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:34 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
Setting hard_limit larger than previous swap_hard_limit must fail, it's not that good if one wants to change the swap_hard_limit and hard_limit together. E.g.
% virsh memtune rhel6 hard_limit : 1000000 soft_limit : 1000000 swap_hard_limit: 1000000
% virsh memtune rhel6 --hard-limit 1000020 --soft-limit 1000020 \ --swap-hard-limit 1000020 --live
This patch reorder the limits setting to set the swap_hard_limit first, hard_limit then, and soft_limit last if it's greater than current swap_hard_limit. And soft_limit first, hard_limit then, swap_hard_limit last, if not. ---
Looks good + works good = ACK ;-)
Martin
Thanks, pushed. Regards, Osier