On 2012年08月17日 16:29, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:34 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> Setting hard_limit larger than previous swap_hard_limit must fail,
> it's not that good if one wants to change the swap_hard_limit
> and hard_limit together. E.g.
>
> % virsh memtune rhel6
> hard_limit : 1000000
> soft_limit : 1000000
> swap_hard_limit: 1000000
>
> % virsh memtune rhel6 --hard-limit 1000020 --soft-limit 1000020 \
> --swap-hard-limit 1000020 --live
>
> This patch reorder the limits setting to set the swap_hard_limit
> first, hard_limit then, and soft_limit last if it's greater than
> current swap_hard_limit. And soft_limit first, hard_limit then,
> swap_hard_limit last, if not.
> ---
Looks good + works good = ACK ;-)
Martin
Thanks, pushed.
Regards,
Osier