On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:21:16PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/10/2017 01:56, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Now, I don't know yet what's the best default for a guest that
> has CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCK when it sees a host that supports
> kvm_pv_unhalt. But I'm arguing that it's the guest
> responsibility to choose what to do when it detects such a host,
> instead of expecting the host to hide features from the guest.
> The guest and the guest administrator have more information to
> choose what's best.
>
> In other words, if exposing kvm_pv_unhalt on CPUID really makes
> some guests behave poorly, can we fix the guests instead?
Waiman just did it. :)
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150972337909996
Thanks for the pointer. I will resubmit the series for 2.12
after 2.11 is released.
--
Eduardo