On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:32:01AM +0000, David Weber wrote:
> This isn't good - the lock manager implementation must be
the
> one to decide what todo with readonly & shared disks. The sanlock
> plugin, however, does not currently support readonly/shared leases
> hence why it rejects them. We could probably add a config param
> to allow readonly/shared leases to be skipped by the sanlock plugin.
Thanks for clarification. I've attached an updated patch which
adds such a config param. It works but I can't test
live-migration at the moment. But as far as I understood it
shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks, your patch looks good but needs two further small additions
to the libvirt_sanlock.aug and test_libvirt_sanlock.aug files to
take account of the new config parameter.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|