On 26.01.2012 12:47, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently, we support only filling a volume with zeroes on wiping.
> However, it is not enough as data might still be readable by
> experienced and equipped attacker. Many technical papers have been
> written, therefore we should support other wiping algorithms.
> ---
> diff to v1:
> -Daniel's suggestions taken in (notably, moved to new API)
> configure.ac | 27 ++++++++++-
> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 30 ++++++++++++
> src/driver.h | 5 ++
> src/libvirt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> src/libvirt_public.syms | 5 ++
> src/remote/remote_driver.c | 1 +
> src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 9 +++-
> src/remote_protocol-structs | 6 ++
> src/storage/storage_driver.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> tools/virsh.c | 37 +++++++++++++--
> tools/virsh.pod | 26 ++++++++++-
> 11 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Sorry I missed this before - it is better to start a new top level
thread, and include "v2" in the subject line to make it stand out,
otherwise it gets threaded in with old archived mail.
Yeah, I've noticed after I sent the e-mail. Sorry for that.
ACK if those minor fixes are done + obvious rebase conflict resolution
Fixed, rebased and pushed. Thanks.
Michal