On 26.01.2012 12:47, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Currently, we support only filling a volume with zeroes on wiping. However, it is not enough as data might still be readable by experienced and equipped attacker. Many technical papers have been written, therefore we should support other wiping algorithms. --- diff to v1: -Daniel's suggestions taken in (notably, moved to new API) configure.ac | 27 ++++++++++- include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 30 ++++++++++++ src/driver.h | 5 ++ src/libvirt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ src/libvirt_public.syms | 5 ++ src/remote/remote_driver.c | 1 + src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 9 +++- src/remote_protocol-structs | 6 ++ src/storage/storage_driver.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- tools/virsh.c | 37 +++++++++++++-- tools/virsh.pod | 26 ++++++++++- 11 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Sorry I missed this before - it is better to start a new top level thread, and include "v2" in the subject line to make it stand out, otherwise it gets threaded in with old archived mail.
Yeah, I've noticed after I sent the e-mail. Sorry for that.
ACK if those minor fixes are done + obvious rebase conflict resolution
Fixed, rebased and pushed. Thanks. Michal