Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3 4/7] remote: implement storage lifecycle event APIs

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:44:09AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >On 06/15/2016 08:42 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >> >>> >>> I do have dwarves installed, but the makefile is complaining about pdwtags: >>> >>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-June/msg00899.html >>> >>> That's with F24. Maybe jovanka is missing dwarves, she's on f23, or maybe the >>> f23 packages are similarly affected >>> >>> >> For reference I have dwarves installed too: >> >> dwarves.x86_64 >> 1.10-8.fc23 >> @fedora >> >> on my f23 box and I've been seeing those messages as well. I tried >> investigating once, but got quickly lost... >> >> >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the >> virkeepaliveprotocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the lock_protocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the remote_protocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the qemu_protocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the lxc_protocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the virnetprotocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the admin_protocol-struct test >> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the >> lxc_monitor_protocol-struct test >> > >Huh... what distro/dwarves version are others using then? > I'm running the latest git master from: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/devel/pahole/pahole.git/ Yes, it has less than 40 commits on top of the "latest" release (4 years ago), but it looks like it works. I remember updating because of similar problem. Looking at the version currently found in f24 it is kind of weird: $ pdwtags src/remote/.libs/libvirt_driver_remote_la-remote_protocol.o die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x1ed> not handled! The error message itself shouldn't be a problem, when I try it with the latest one from git I get bunch of those on stderr, but all the stuff I need on stdout. Whoa, so pdwtags in f24 is version 1.9 which is 2 years older than the 4 your old 1.10... Looks like there's nobody packaging that for Fedora.

>- Cole >