于 2011年09月13日 18:07, Daniel Veillard 写道:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:18:40PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:08:00PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> Err, my example *was* still requiring that apps use 'import
libvirt_qemu'
>> in order to get access to the QEMU specific APIs, and use that separate
>> objects to get their connection handle.
> yes but from that point on if you use inheritance, the fact of using
> the qemu tainted objects instead of the normal ones disapear completely.
> The fact of using those temporary APIs get hidden in an import and a
> new() somewhere. I would really prefer to see something explicit at the
> place where it is used, something that people can't miss where reading
> the code using it.
Okay, the two Dan disagree but none want to force the issue, can other
people voice in so that we can go with the majority :-) ?
Daniel
I have ever did a first version as what danpb suggested. But when talked
with DV on Friday morning, I was persuaed, so, I vote for defining the
function without class in libvirt_qemu.py, note that this will ease my
work. :-)
Regards,
Osier