
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:13:16PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On a Monday in 2020, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 14:30:30 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On a Monday in 2020, Peter Krempa wrote:
Remove the gray background and switch to underlined links.
Here, I prefer the old look. The difference with the ToC might be that the ToC entries are indented.
Both links and background? In case you prefer the old links I might want to get rid of the background at least.
Sorry, I only compared the overall look.
After some experimenting, what concerns me most is the spacing:
In the old version the gray panel aligns with the 'Knowledge base' heading.
In the white one, the K aligns with 'Debug logs' and it's too close to the heading.
So I miss mostly: padding: 0.5 em; that came from the panel.
1. I'm okay with dropping the gray background, since the kbase page is different. (The bikeshedding question is: will we eventually fill it enough to warrant a return of the gray panels and put three of them on a computer screen?)
As we migrate the wiki content it'll mostly end up in the kbase, and I expect we'll want to split the kbase index into a series of groups with panels, like we do for the main docs page and front page. This was the main reason why I had the page rendered the way it currently is. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|