On 19.08.2013 11:06, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09.08.2013 18:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> [CC'ing qemu-devel list]
>>>> On 09.08.2013 15:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:13:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/09/2013 06:56 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>
>
> So what's the conclusion? Should I push the patch until qemu gets
> stabilized in mem consumption (which can take a while - no offense to
> qemu devels, I can imagine it's nontrivial).
Given the lack of any useful info to make memory limits work reliably,
I guess we don't have any choice but to remove this default memory limit,
and also recommend against people setting explicit memory limits too.
Regards,
Daniel
Okay, I've pushed the patch. And I've just proposed patch to discourage
users setting this limit:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-August/msg00820.html
Michal