On 05/18/2016 10:59 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:58 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 07:53 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Kind of. Prior to patch #2, the test suite output was correct (no addresses),
>> it's what we were returning via domxml-from-native. After patch #2, the test
>> suite output was wrong for all real world usage; it didn't change because it
>> was only hitting a !QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE code path
>>
>> So the potentially contentious bit is that patch #2 changes domxml-from-native
>> output to contain addresses, however that's exactly the same result that
will
>> happen when the XML would eventually be defined anyways, so it's effectively
>> the same result as pre-patch #2 anyways. If we think of domxml-from-native as
>> telling the user 'this is exactly what libvirt thinks that command line
is'
>> then we are now giving more accurate results
>>
>> Let me know if that still warrants the ACK
>
> My opinion is that this is a change for the better. While it is true
> that this could lead to XML that potentially shows different PCI
> addresses than what would have been auto-assigned by qemu when presented
> with the original commandline, it *is* showing the addresses that would
> be auto-allocated by libvirt if you had fed the "un-addressified" XML to
> libvirt - so at least the user will get a warning rather than being
> surprised at runtime. And it's not as if the output of
> domxml-from-native has ever produced anything even close to the correct
> XML in any real world situation. (dreadkopp in public #virt pastebin'ed
> an example last night - 90% of it was translated directly into
> <qemu:arg> elements).
After reading Cole's explanation, I tend to agree.
So I guess we can go ahead and merge this, as well as 5/4 :)
Thanks pushed now with your suggested changes, except the bits I just mailed about
- Cole