Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] configure: rbd doesn't need -lcrypto

See https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg00493.html Basically building against librbd doesn't seem to actually require -lcrypto. Also report the rbd linker flags in configure output Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com&gt; --- configure.ac | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index d45f4f1..ae814cb 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" || test "$with_storage_rbd" = "check"; then if test "$LIBRBD_FOUND" = "yes"; then with_storage_rbd=yes - LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados -lcrypto" + LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados" AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([WITH_STORAGE_RBD], [1], [whether RBD backend for storage driver is enabled]) else @@ -2962,6 +2962,12 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: $XDR_CFLAGS]) else AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: no]) fi +if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" ; then +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: $LIBRBD_LIBS]) +else +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: no]) +fi + AC_MSG_NOTICE([]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([Test suite]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([])