On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:49:45 +0200 Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/24/2010 06:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:42:16 +0200 Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
So, at best qemud is a toy for people who are annoyed by libvirt.
Is the reason for doing this in qemu because libvirt is annoying?
Mostly.
I don't see how adding yet another layer/daemon is going to improve ours and user's life (the same applies for libqemu).
libvirt becomes optional.
I think it should only be optional if all you want is to run a single VM in this case what seems to be missing on our side is a _real_ GUI, bundled with QEMU potentially written in a high-level language. Then we make virt-manager optional and this is good because we can sync features way faster and we don't have to care about _managing_ several VMs, our world in terms of usability and maintainability is about one VM. IMVHO, everything else should be done by third-party tools like libvirt, we just provide the means for it.