On 07/12/2013 11:57 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/12/2013 06:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:55:53PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Add a new qemuMonitorJSONSetObjectProperty() method to support invocation
>> of the 'qom-set' JSON monitor command with a provided path, property,
and
>> expected data type to set.
>>
>> The test code uses the same "/machine/i440fx" property as the get test
and
>> attempts to set the "realized" property to "true" (which it
should be set
>> at anyway).
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 6 +++++
>> tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
>
> ACK
Again, shouldn't this function be marked static, and the .h file left alone?
I can go either way on this - without the .h changes, we don't have the
test though. So whichever way is preferred - I'll go with it...
John