On 04/19/2011 10:59 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:53:05PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:03:03PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:31:05PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>>> 1) libvirt
>>>
>>> At the libvirt layer, this feature just requires 3 new APIs, which
>>> are directly passed through to netcf:
>>>
>>> virInterfaceChangeStart(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>> virInterfaceChangeCommit(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>> virInterfaceChangeRollback(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>>
>>> For the initial implementation, these will be simple passthroughs
>>> to similarly named netcf functions. (in the future, it would be
>>> useful for the server side of libvirt to determine if
client<->server
>>> connectivity was lost due to the network changes, and automatically
>>> tell netcf to do a rollback).
>> When such a feature is added, we should make it dependent on FLAG_AUTO_ROLLBACK
>> passed to ChangeStart. Higher levels on the management stack may want full
>> controll over when rollback happens.
> I don't think a AUTO_ROLLBACK flag is sufficient. You'd almost certainly
> want to pass some info such as hostname/port number to test, and perhaps
> a test timeout in milliseconds, and perhaps a retry count.
Yes, that's why I wanted complete control over auto rollback, when it is
inroduced.
What about the rollback that takes place at boot time if the changes
haven't been committed? Should that *always* happen, or should it be
controllable by flags as well. I had intended that at least that
automatic rollback would be present in the first implementation...