On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 18:38:05 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Rename the function to virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskInfo and make it
> check disk serials too.
>
> Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245013
> ---
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 +-
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 2 +-
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 393ece7..e9d61db 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -24451,7 +24451,7 @@ virDomainDefNeedsPlacementAdvice(virDomainDefPtr def)
>
>
> int
> -virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskWWN(virDomainDefPtr def)
> +virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskInfo(virDomainDefPtr def)
> {
> size_t i;
> size_t j;
> @@ -24469,6 +24469,19 @@ virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskWWN(virDomainDefPtr def)
> }
> }
> }
> +
> + if (def->disks[i]->serial) {
> + for (j = i + 1; j < def->ndisks; j++) {
> + if (STREQ_NULLABLE(def->disks[i]->serial,
> + def->disks[j]->serial)) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
> + _("Disks '%s' and '%s' have
identical serial"),
> + def->disks[i]->dst,
> + def->disks[j]->dst);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> + }
Any reason for going through all disks twice? Wouldn't it be better to
go through them once and check for both serial and wwn within a single
loop? :-)
Erm. I'm going to blame me writing suboptimal (read: crappy) code on
hunger.
Peter