2 Oct
2017
2 Oct
'17
10:14 a.m.
[...]
Even though I came with another proposal, I personally still like the previous version with one-by-one event version, since despite (perhaps) being a bit slower, it's a more transparent and consistent (minus the event counter) solution than the one I proposed the last time.
Erik
I don't have that version paged into short term memory ;-)... If you have a thread that processes events until udev_monitor_receive_device returns NULL, then does that do the trick? Regardless of event counting?
Well, so far it's just an idea, I haven't tried it yet, it's just it appeared to me like it could. I'll try and get back with results. Erik