On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:01:45PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:16:11PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:51:34AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> > > > + */
> > > > +gboolean gvir_domain_get_saved(GVirDomain *dom)
> > >
> > > The naming needs to be more explicit, libvirt will suspend the domain
after
> > > a call to virDomainSave or virDomainManagedSave, the current name only
> > > checks for the latter state. I'd go for
> > > gvir_domain_has_managed_save_image();
> >
> > I see this patch has been pushed to master with this part unchanged and no
> > discussion whatsoever on the list, what happened there?
>
> Oh, I ACK'd his new patch, without noticing your message in this
> thread.
And I had missed the other thread too :)
Zeeshan, it's up to the patch submitter to keep track of the comments
raised during review,
So sorry, I somehow missed that part of your mail. It was an honest mistake.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124