Since this rpm released already, should fix be made anyway? Should it just treat that comma as a dot (current fix is a little bit more sophisticated)? On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>wrote:
On 25.09.2012 15:01, Dmitry Fleytman wrote:
Hi, Michal,
This is qemu 1.0.1 rpm from fc17.
Yup, it's a bug. A typo to be exact.
Here is the build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344872
and if you'd download and unpack .src.rpm and subsequently qemu-kvm-1.0.1.tar.gz you'll find VERSION file. Since everything (spec file, archive name, etc.) but VERSION file says 1.0.1 I assume it's a typo and hence the bug. I must admit very tricky one, though.
[CC'ing Cole who made the build so maybe he can spin another one]
Michal
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 25, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote:
On 25.09.2012 10:58, Dmitry Fleytman wrote:
This patch fixes incorrect help screen parsing for QEMU 1.0.1 package Version line changed from QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard To QEMU emulator version 1.0,1 (qemu-kvm-1.0.1), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
This seems like a bug to me. If it is a micro version number, why is it delimited with comma instead of dot? If it is not a micro version number, can we threat it like it is?
BTW: what distro is this so I can chase this down to see if it's a bug or not?
Michal
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
-- Dmitry Fleytman Technology Expert and Consultant, Daynix Computing Ltd. Cell: +972-54-2819481 Skype: dmitry.fleytman