Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us
give our
> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
> >
> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
> > ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence
> > in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic"
More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find
anything that's utterly broken in the design".
And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin
pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible".
Paolo
If we feel there's need to give libvirt a way to do
introspection into QEMU bugs, let's architect one.
Randomly renaming devices in the vain hope it's
the last major bug is not it.