On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:29:19PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 19:18:53 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virbitmap.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virbitmap.c b/src/util/virbitmap.c
> index 4c205016ff..f7dd5d05ad 100644
> --- a/src/util/virbitmap.c
> +++ b/src/util/virbitmap.c
[...]
> @@ -126,10 +121,9 @@ virBitmapNewEmpty(void)
> void
> virBitmapFree(virBitmapPtr bitmap)
> {
> - if (bitmap) {
> - VIR_FREE(bitmap->map);
> - VIR_FREE(bitmap);
> - }
> + if (bitmap)
> + g_free(bitmap->map);
Preferrably keep this VIR_FREE or it's expansion to g_clear_pointer. If
a caller uses a stale pointer, it will crash on dereferencing this part.
There's no strong reason to do that in a vir*Free() function, since
'bitmap' itself is being freed.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|