On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:50:38AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 01/27/2011 02:45 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:08:51 +0800 Li Zefan<lizf(a)cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>>Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:39:48 +0100
>>>Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano(a)free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>>This patch removes the ns_cgroup as suggested in the following thread:
>>>I had this patch queued up in September last year, but dropped it. Why
>>>did I do that?
>>Because you wanted to wait for some time for users (if any) to notice this
>>coming change.
>>
>>Author: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano(a)free.fr>
>>Date: Wed Oct 27 15:33:38 2010 -0700
>>
>> cgroup: notify ns_cgroup deprecated
>>
>> The ns_cgroup will be removed very soon. Let's warn, for this version,
>> ns_cgroup is deprecated.
>>
>> Make ns_cgroup and clone_children exclusive. If the clone_children is set
>> and the ns_cgroup is mounted, let's fail with EINVAL when the ns_cgroup
>> subsys is created (a printk will help the user to understand why the
>> creation fails).
>>
>> Update the feature remove schedule file with the deprecated ns_cgroup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano(a)free.fr>
>> Acked-by: Paul Menage<menage(a)google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton<akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds<torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org>
>ooh, that was clever of me.
>
>Here is the text which was missing from the changelog:
>
> This is a userspace-visible change. Commit 45531757b45c ("cgroup:
> notify ns_cgroup deprecated") (merged into 2.6.27) caused the kernel
> to emit a printk warning users that the feature is planned for
> removal. Since that time we have heard from XXX users who were
> affected by this.
>
>Please provide XXX.
Ok, AFAIK nobody makes use of the ns_cgroup except the LXC userspace
tools which I maintain and where
the backward compatibility with the ns_cgroup and the clone_children
flag is already implemented.
Since today nobody seems to be affected by this.
I Cc'ed the libvirt mailing list.
Removing 'ns_cgroup' won't impact libvirt's container
support in any negative way, so fine by me.
Regards,
Daniel