＞On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:23:19PM +0800, ZhiPeng Lu wrote:
＞＞ Creating tap device and adding the device to bridge are not atomic operation.
＞＞ Similarly deleting tap device and removing it from bridge are not atomic operation.
＞＞The Problem occurs when two vms start and shutdown. When one vm with the nic
＞＞ named "vnet0" stopping, it deleted tap device but not removing port from bridge.
＞＞ At this time, another vm created the tap device named "vnet0" and added port to the
＞＞ same bridge. Then, the first vm deleted the tap device from the same bridge.
＞＞ Finally, the tap device of the second vm don't attached to the bridge.
＞＞ So, we can add domid to vm's nic name. For example, the vm's domid is 1 and vnet0
＞＞ is renamed to vnet1.0.

＞Surely deleting the NIC automatically removes it from the bridge so we
＞can just remove the code that delets the bridge port.

i have done some tests for a tap + openvswitch bridge network.  i find  the nic named "vnet0" don't exsit before calling the virNetDevOpenvswitchRemovePort.

i think  the tap is deleted not by removingport  from bridge. i think hotpluging net has the same problem.

by the way:

      my company's e-mail  does not support thread posting  and has some other problems. i believe that my colleagues can soon resloved them.

为了让您的VPlat虚拟化故障得到高效的处理，请上报故障到: $VPlat技术支持。

芦志朋 luzhipeng

IT开发工程师 IT Development Engineer
操作系统产品部/中心研究院/系统产品 OS Product Dept./Central R＆D Institute/System Product

深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R&D Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P.R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 xxxxxxxx F:+86 755 xxxxxxxx M: +86 xxxxxxxxxxx E: lu.zhipeng@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn