
Sorry for the delay, i just came back from a long holiday. On 10/02/2015 11:49 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/30/2015 12:01 AM, Luyao Huang wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265114
When pass 0 page_size to virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath function, we will get fail like this:
error : virFileReadAll:1358 : Failed to read file '/sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/': Is a directory
Because when the page_size is 0 the virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath will build the directory of system path, but we don't want that.
Introduce a new helper to build the dir path could avoid this issue.
This appears to be just a straight refactor - it took me a while to figure out why the key was 'page_size == 0'. Looking at "just" this context it would seem virNumaGetPages using 0 && suffix==NULL was the only user/cause for this. But the real abuser/issue shows up in patch 2 where if "other" callers use a page_size == 0, then we have issues.
So, how about the following for a commit message:
Refactor virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath to handle the passing a page_size of 0 and suffix == NULL into a new function virNumaGetHugePageInfoDir. Function virNumaGetPages expects to return a directory; whereas, other callers that passed a page_size == 0 would not expect a directory path in return. Each of those callers will use virFileReadAll which fails if a directory path is returned as follows:
error : virFileReadAll:1358 : Failed to read file '/sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/': Is a directory
Looks good to me, thanks a lot for your help.
Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang@redhat.com> --- src/util/virnuma.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virnuma.c b/src/util/virnuma.c index 1a62d62..8577bd8 100644 --- a/src/util/virnuma.c +++ b/src/util/virnuma.c @@ -493,45 +493,39 @@ virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath(char **path, unsigned int page_size, const char *suffix) { - - int ret = -1; - if (node == -1) { /* We are aiming at overall system info */ - if (page_size) { - /* And even on specific huge page size */ if (virAsprintf(path, HUGEPAGES_SYSTEM_PREFIX HUGEPAGES_PREFIX "%ukB/%s", page_size, suffix ? suffix : "") < 0) Now this has too many spaces shifted to the right (4 to be exact)
Indeed, i forgot this during wrote this patch.
- goto cleanup; - } else { - if (VIR_STRDUP(*path, HUGEPAGES_SYSTEM_PREFIX) < 0) - goto cleanup; - } - + return -1; } else { /* We are aiming on specific NUMA node */ - if (page_size) { - /* And even on specific huge page size */ if (virAsprintf(path, HUGEPAGES_NUMA_PREFIX "node%d/hugepages/" HUGEPAGES_PREFIX "%ukB/%s", node, page_size, suffix ? suffix : "") < 0) same note here
- goto cleanup; - } else { - if (virAsprintf(path, - HUGEPAGES_NUMA_PREFIX "node%d/hugepages/", - node) < 0) - goto cleanup; - } + return -1; }
- ret = 0; - cleanup: - return ret; + return 0; }
+static int +virNumaGetHugePageInfoDir(char **path, int node) +{ + if (node == -1) { + if (VIR_STRDUP(*path, HUGEPAGES_SYSTEM_PREFIX) < 0) + return -1; + } else { + if (virAsprintf(path, + HUGEPAGES_NUMA_PREFIX "node%d/hugepages/", + node) < 0) + return -1; Even more optimization could be to just return VIR_STRDUP or virAsprintf result.
Similarly the virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath can have the same change - that is return directly from virAsprintf commands.
Right, i missed this, thanks for pointing out that.
I can adjust the commit message and nits - just let me know if the new commit message reads better.
The new commit message is better, thanks a lot for your review and help !
John
+ }
+ return 0; +} /** * virNumaGetHugePageInfo: * @node: NUMA node id @@ -724,7 +718,7 @@ virNumaGetPages(int node, * is always shown as used memory. Here, however, we want to report * slightly different information. So we take the total memory on a node * and subtract memory taken by the huge pages. */ - if (virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath(&path, node, 0, NULL) < 0) + if (virNumaGetHugePageInfoDir(&path, node) < 0) goto cleanup;
if (!(dir = opendir(path))) {
Luyao