I tested on 1.0.5 patched version and vm with 2 vfs working fine.
I have another problem
When i set max_vfs=63:
internal error missing IFLA_VF_INFO in netlink response
Its working when max_vfs=31
--
Dominik
21 maj 2013 15:19, "Dominik Mostowiec" <dominikmostowiec(a)gmail.com>
napisał(a):
Hmm,
It seems to be working (after only simple tests).
--
Dominik
2013/5/21 Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
> On 05/21/2013 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> > On 05/21/2013 04:03 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >> On 05/21/2013 09:32 AM, Dominik Mostowiec wrote:
> >>> hi,
> >>> I try to add 2 VF by "hostdev".
> >>> Networks (vnet0, vnet1) with:
> >>> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'>
> >>> <pf dev='eth1'/>
> >>> .....
> >>>
> >>> Domain:
> >>> <interface type="network">
> >>> <source network="vnet0"/>
> >>> ....
> >>> <interface type="network">
> >>> <source network="vnet1"/>
> >>> ....
> >>>
> >>> virsh create error:
> >>> "error: internal error process exited while connecting to monitor:
> kvm:
> >>> -device
> pci-assign,configfd=25,host=01:10.1,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4:
> >>> Duplicate ID 'hostdev0' for device"
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> it seems we have been assigning the same id to all network hostdevs
> until this
> >> recent commit (not yet released):
> >>
> >>
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6597cc25
> >
> >
> > If that patch has such an effect, it's purely accidental. Have you
> > tested this? (I plan to test a before and after as soon as I've had
> > breakfast)
> >
>
> I haven't tested it and looking at the code again, I might've been wrong
> :(
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> Jan
>
>
>
>
--
Pozdrawiam
Dominik