Re: [libvirt PATCH 0/8] rpm: Fix handling of systemd units
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:42:19AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 05:20:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > If we at least start the discussion, we can get feedback on whether the
> > > idea is likely to gain traction, or there are other things we have
> > > overlooked
> >
> > I can open an issue on the systemd side pointing to these patches,
> > but polishing things up to the level of a proper PR is off the table
> > right now because I simply can't allocate enough time for it. Would
> > you consider that good enough to move forward with the libvirt
> > changes?
> >
> > On the Fedora side, I wouldn't know what forum would be the most
> > appropriate to get the discussion started. Any pointers?
>
> Fedora devel list is probably the catch all place to raise it
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/
Done.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
Summing up the discussion that happened in that thread over the last
week:
* while the proper way to address the issue at hand is to change or
replace the macros shipped with systemd;
* given that such a process would require more time than we have
available before Fedora and RHEL users are affected;
* there is no strong objection to libvirt adopting the solution
that I've implemented as a temporary measure.
Based on the above and the fact that the series is now fully ACKed, I
will push it before the end of the day so that it can be part of rc2.
Please shout if you have a problem with this plan!
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization