On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:42:19AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 05:20:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
If we at least start the discussion, we can get feedback on whether the idea is likely to gain traction, or there are other things we have overlooked
I can open an issue on the systemd side pointing to these patches, but polishing things up to the level of a proper PR is off the table right now because I simply can't allocate enough time for it. Would you consider that good enough to move forward with the libvirt changes?
On the Fedora side, I wouldn't know what forum would be the most appropriate to get the discussion started. Any pointers?
Fedora devel list is probably the catch all place to raise it
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/
Done.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/...
Summing up the discussion that happened in that thread over the last week: * while the proper way to address the issue at hand is to change or replace the macros shipped with systemd; * given that such a process would require more time than we have available before Fedora and RHEL users are affected; * there is no strong objection to libvirt adopting the solution that I've implemented as a temporary measure. Based on the above and the fact that the series is now fully ACKed, I will push it before the end of the day so that it can be part of rc2. Please shout if you have a problem with this plan! -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization