On 03/24/2015 04:30 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
HI,
Do you have plan to update this patchset based on the comments
recently or have the latest one to post?
The develop plan for cpu hotplug in qemu has been changed, it is to add
socket-based
device_add.
So I think we could not continue this cpu hotplug work in libvirt until the
interface about this feature in qemu could be determined.
Thanks,
Zhu
I noticed that the patchset for memory hotplug had got merged, is
there any plan to merge this patchset?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 19:53:13 +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Any comments about this series?
>>
>> I'm not sure whether this series' method to support cpu hotplug in
>> libvirt is reasonable, so could anyone give more suggestions about this
>> function? Thanks.
> Well, as Dan pointed out in his review for this series and previous
> version, we are not convinced that we need a way to specify the CPU
> model and other parameters as having dissimilar CPUs doesn't make sense.
>
> A solution is either to build the cpu plug on top of the existing API or
> provide enough information to convince us that having the cpu model in
> the XML actually makes sense.
>
>> Regards,
>> Zhu
> Peter
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list