On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:57:05PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:54:19PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > Just stumpbled on another issue:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:43:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > @@ -366,6 +367,13 @@ struct _virDomainGraphicsDef {
> > > char *display;
> > > int fullscreen : 1;
> > > } desktop;
> > > + struct {
> > > + int port;
> > > + int tlsPort;
> > > + char *listenAddr;
> > > + char *keymap;
> > > + char *passwd;
> > > + } spice;
> > > } data;
> > > };
> >
> > just like vnc, spice needs autoport here (as well as in the schema).
> >
> > I wanted to ignore that, however, migration is impossibly unreliable
> > without autoport=yes - the destination may have the port binded to
> > something else.
>
> Ok, i'll add that.
BTW, is there any recommended port range to use for SPICE TCP and
TLS ports ? VNC for example starts at 5900 and searches upwards
currently I use 5900 upward for spice ports too, and 5900 downward for
tlsPort. (better keep it this way to save changes in iptables)