On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 13:08:51 +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:39:23AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> --- tools/virsh.pod | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
+Moreover, for some architectures libvirt does not know any CPU models and +the usable CPU models are only limited by the hypervisor.
Wonder if it is worth adding a small example for the above.
An example for what exactly?
I meant an example of a usable CPU model that libvirt doesn't know for the said architecture(s). Maybe it's not worth it; not quite sure.
This command will +print that all CPU models are accepted for these architectures.
s/CPU models are accepted/CPU models that are accepted/
It's certainly possible my wording was not perfect, but this change would make it wrong.
Err, sorry, I misread that sentence; please disregard the above. [...] -- /kashyap