Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3 2/3] libxl: move begin phase job handling

On 02/02/2016 01:23 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 01/20/2016 12:00 PM, Joao Martins wrote: >> . From libxlMigrationBegin to libxlDomainMigrateBegin3Params(). >> This is a preparatory patch to be able to begin a job in the >> perform phase. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins(a)oracle.com&gt; >> --- >> src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- >> src/libxl/libxl_migration.c | 16 +++------------- >> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c >> index d34f843..28220b2 100644 >> --- a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c >> +++ b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c >> @@ -5187,6 +5187,8 @@ libxlDomainMigrateBegin3Params(virDomainPtr domain, >> { >> const char *xmlin = NULL; >> virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL; >> + libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver; >> + char *ret; >> >> #ifdef LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME >> virReportUnsupportedError(); >> @@ -5223,7 +5225,21 @@ libxlDomainMigrateBegin3Params(virDomainPtr domain, >> return NULL; >> } >> >> - return libxlDomainMigrationBegin(domain->conn, vm, xmlin); >> + driver = domain->conn->privateData; >> + if (libxlDomainObjBeginJob(driver, vm, LIBXL_JOB_MODIFY) < 0) { >> + virObjectUnlock(vm); >> + return NULL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = libxlDomainMigrationBegin(domain->conn, vm, xmlin); >> + >> + if (!libxlDomainObjEndJob(driver, vm)) >> + vm = NULL; > IIRC the qemu driver handles this a bit differently, and probably more > correctly. On the sender, a job is started during the begin phase and ended in > the confirm phase. On the receiver, a job is started in the prepare phase and > ended in the finish phase. This prevents modifying the virDomainObj between > phases, e.g. the begin and perform phases on the sender. Is it possible to > change the job handling similarly in the libxl migration phases? > Yeah, IIUC I believe this is the behavior depicted by VIR_MIGRATE_CHANGE_PROTECTION flag in which is set by default if the driver support it. So since we're going this way, we should adversite it too in libxlConnectSupportsFeature() ?

Btw, the P2P patch keeps the original behavior wrt to jobs, and these two patches meant solely for improving job handling in migration in general. What do you think in making it a separate patch from this series? (with the changes suggested above)