
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:23:46PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The project has historically operated as a meritocratic consensus based community. Formally document what has always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct to prempt any potential, but unlikely, future problems. + <li>User help: join the IRC channel or mailing list to assist or advice + other users in troubleshooting the problems they face.</li>
Here would be an ideal place to add <a href...> pointing to the contact page, so someone can actually find the IRC channel or list :)
Good idea.
+ <li>Code review: look at patches which are submitted and critique + the code to identify bugs, potential design problems or other + issues which should be addressed before the code is accepted</li>
Maybe even mention that merely testing a build with the proposed patch applied, without actually understanding the code, is also a valid form of review.
I've added another bullet point about testing patches + release candidates. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|