On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:59:27 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> @@ -69,7 +69,15 @@ remoteSplitURIScheme(virURI *uri,
> char **driver,
> remoteDriverTransport *transport)
> {
> - char *p = strchr(uri->scheme, '+');
> + char *p = NULL;
> +
> + if (!uri->scheme) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s",
> + _("missing scheme for URI"));
The other place which leads to the call of this helper (virConnectOpenInternal)
uses the following error to reject the uri if scheme is missing:
virReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_CONNECT,
_("URI '%s' does not include a driver name"),
name);
Yeah, it seems safer to catch the issue inside the helper than
requiring the callers to perform the check ahead of time. It's okay
for virConnectOpen() to have a nicer error message, as it's the one
that people are more likely to see.
I entertained the thought of adding the check to virURIParse()
directly, because I can't think of a scenario where having a NULL
scheme would be considered valid. But that seemed like a change that
had the potential to break unrelated stuff, so I cowardly decided to
go with the safe version instead O:-)
It looks like it's unlikely that anybody would use
virt-ssh-helper
manually though.
Absolutely! But it's still in the default $PATH, and not crashing
when passed invalid arguments is what I would consider the bare
minimum :)
Thanks for the review!
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization