On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:46:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>On 09/08/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 7 +++-
>>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 5 +++
>>> src/conf/cpu_conf.c | 25 +++++++++++-
>>> src/conf/cpu_conf.h | 7 ++--
>>> .../qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml | 28 ++++++++++++++
>>> .../qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml | 45
++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 2 +
>>> 7 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml
>>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> index 94236dd..b284d6e 100644
>>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@
>>> ...
>>> <numa>
>>> <cell id='0' cpus='0-3'
memory='512000'/>
>>> - <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000'/>
>>> + <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000' memShared='on'/>
>>
>>I wonder if "shared='on'" would be enough, avoiding the need
for a multi-word
>>attribute.
>
>Or how about access="shared|private" ?
>
I prepended the "mem" so that it is visible that it has something to
do with the memory, not the whole node. But I'm OK with pushing
shared= as well. Using access= seems too ambiguously worded to me,
although if most of you agree...
Sure, memAccess is fine with me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|