On 19.08.2014 19:23, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:00:26AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/19/2014 10:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>> rtc-reset-reinjection has been introduced because certain Windows
>> versions will advance the guest system time (via rtc interrupt
>> reinjection).
>>
>> So if libvirt adjusts the guest system time via guest-set-time,
>> allowing rtc interrupt reinjection to compensate for lost time,
>> as well, will cause an incorrect guest system time.
>>
>> So you should always use the
>>
>> guest-set-time
>> rtc-reset-reinjection
>>
>> pair.
>
> But is that true both for the 'guest-set-time' no-arg case (which tells
> the guest to read the current RTC and update in-memory time
> accordingly), as well as the 'guest-set-time with time argument' case
> (which tells the guest to forcefully set in-memory time, then write that
> time back to the RTC)?
Yes.
Okay then. I'm posting v3 here [1] which unconditionally calls the
monitor command right after the guest agent command.
Michal
1:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg00867.html