5 Mar
2014
5 Mar
'14
10:42 a.m.
On 03/04/2014 03:30 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
Currently, <cputune><shares>0</shares></cputune> is treated as if it were not specified.
s/were/was/ in this particular case, I guess.
I think this particular case is a perfectly cromulent use of the past subjunctive to express a counterfactual condition.
ACK,
Martin
Thank you for the review, I will take another look at the series before pushing, since this was an RFC. Jan