On 8/24/20 6:30 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 8/23/20 1:51 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Back when the original version of this chunk of code was added (commit
> 41b087198 in libvirt-0.8.1 in April 2010), we used virExecDaemonize()
> to start the qemu process, and would continue on in the function
> (which at that time was called qemudStartVMDaemon()) even if a -1 was
> returned. So it was possible to get to this code with rv == -1 (it was
> called "ret" in that version of the code).
>
> In modern libvirt code, qemu is started with virCommandRun(); then we
> call virPidFileReadPath(); those are the only two ways of setting "rv"
> prior to this code being removed, and in either case if the new value
> of rv < 0, then we immediately skip over the rest of the code to the
> cleanup: label.
>
> This means that the code being removed by this patch is
> unreachable.
>
> (NB: anyway, attempting to fend off accidental removal of some other
> guest's nwfilter rules by carefully ordering all nwfilter teardowns to
> happen "before tap device deletion" is a fruitless pursuit, because a
> tap device could be deleted by the qemu process being terminated
> external to libvirt, i.e. we must instead avoid re-using tap device
> names. That is coming.)
Is it better for this patch to be pushed after "conf: properly clear out
autogenerated macvtap ..." then?
Nah, it's unreachable code in any case, so its removal is independent of
anything else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine(a)redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413(a)gmail.com>
Thanks!