On 04/26/2010 04:43 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The reason I lean toward the direct launch model is that it gives the
user a lot of flexibility in terms of using things like namespaces,
DAC, cgroups, capabilities, etc. A lot of potential features are lost
when you do indirect launch because you have to teach the daemon how
to support each of these features.
But what's the alternative? Teach the user how to do all these things?
It's infinitely flexible, but it's not an API you can give to a
management tool developer.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function