On 08/08/2011 04:20 AM, Alex Jia wrote:
> Detected by Coverity.
>
> * src/storage/storage_backend.c: avoid missing break in default branch.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721335
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> index 6243d1e..004bc66 100644
> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> @@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ virStorageBackendCreateQemuImg(virConnectPtr conn,
> virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "%lluK", size_arg);
> if (do_encryption)
> virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-e");
> + break;
> }
NACK. The last label in a switch statement does not need a break, so
this can't possibly fix a bug. Can you post the actual Coverity trace
that led you to believe this was where it was reporting about? I
suspect that this is instead a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711151.
Yeah, I'm cancelling this patch. in fact, this issue has been fixed by Cole
Robinson: