On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:12 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 16.07.2018 09:32, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Libvirt developers would like to be copied on patches to qemu-doc
> appendix "Deprecated features". Do them the favor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 20eef3cb61..666e936812 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2194,6 +2194,10 @@ M: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> S: Odd Fixes
> F: docs/devel/build-system.txt
>
> +Incompatible changes
> +R: libvir-list(a)redhat.com
> +F: qemu-deprecated.texi
Should we have a maintainer for the file, too? (I guess not, because
deprecation patches should go through the specific subsystems...)
I don't think adding a maintainer makes sense for this file.
And what about a "S:" line?
I don't think that makes too much sense, either.
If anything, qemu-deprecated.texi should be in a category 'maintained
by everybody', i.e. qemu-devel. Just like qemu-doc.texi, which does not
have an entry in MAINTAINERS at all.