On 01/22/2013 11:32 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/22/2013 07:40 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> The use of switch statements inside a bounded for loop resulted in some
> false positives regarding the "default:" label which cannot be reached
> since each of the other case statements use the possible for loop values.
> A [dead_error_begin] was added before the default label.
>
> Commit id ebdbe25a adjusted the algorithm and the caller guarantees that
> the 'params' will have a '_' in the name being searched. Add the
[returned_null]
> tag to the two instances.
> ---
> src/nodeinfo.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/nodeinfo.c b/src/nodeinfo.c
> index 477104f..a05159c 100644
> --- a/src/nodeinfo.c
> +++ b/src/nodeinfo.c
> @@ -1124,6 +1124,7 @@ nodeSetMemoryParameterValue(virTypedParameterPtr param)
> int ret = -1;
> int rc = -1;
>
> + /* coverity[returned_null] */
> char *field = strchr(param->field, '_');
Another possibility is to use:
char *field = strchr(param->field, '_');
sa_assert(field);
which would have the advantage of working with clang in addition to
Coverity, if clang also turns out to have the same false positive.
That works too - I will put together a new patch
John