On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:06:08PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
> I wonder if there's a way to close the testing gap somehow ? Random idea
> would be a non-versioned "pc-no-deprecated" machine type, which blocks
> all use of deprecated features and does not promise any migration compat.
> Essentially it would exist just for testing purposem as a way todo
> functional tests for libvirt & mgmt apps to prove they don't use any
> deprecated features (any deprecated features, not merely this NUMA one).
This isn't the first time I wish we had a machine type with
experimental features enabled. What about calling it "pc-next"?
No objection from me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|